Mickey's Christmas Carol (1983)
Upon its theatrical release, Mickey’s Christmas Carol was the first animated film to star Mickey Mouse for thirty years. It was therefore accompanied with a large amount of hype and a wave of nostalgia. The US marketing stated “He’s Back. Mickey Mouse in his first new motion picture” which was somewhat misleading, as the actual animated film was just 26 minutes long. It was shown theatrically along with a re-release of The Rescuers in the US and The Jungle Book in the UK and other territories, in late December 1983. And despite his name being in the title, Mickey doesn’t have a lot of screen time as he plays Bob Cratchit. This is very much a vehicle for Scrooge McDuck as Ebenezer Scrooge. Overall, it’s a succinct distillation of the plot of Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, filled with cameo appearances by classic Disney characters. Naturally it is replete with the humour and sentiment that is inherent in the process known colloquially as Disneyfication. However, does this mitigate the book’s message?
Part of the fun of watching Mickey’s Christmas Carol is trying to spot various iconic Disney characters, many of which are in minor roles in the background such as the Big, Bad Wolf and the Three Little Pigs. The larger roles are played by the likes of Donald Duck (Scrooge’s nephew Fred), Goofy (incongruously playing Marley’s ghost) and Jiminy Cricket (the Ghost of Christmas Past). The verbal and visual humour you expect from Disney is clearly front and centre. The scene where Scrooge climbs the stairs to his suite of rooms, followed by Jacob Marley’s spectral shadow, is a wonderfully contrived piece of animation and up to the high standard you’d expect from the studio. As ever there are a lot of innovative shots from aerial perspectives and sequences involving a lot of movement both in the foreground and background. All are lovingly drawn and painted by hand, imbuing the characters with a sense of personality and charisma.
Charm and overt sentimentality are in the very DNA of Disney productions. Hence any material that the studio adapts always has such content enhanced and amplified. This is Disney’s brand of entertainment. For younger, unsophisticated viewers, Mickey’s Christmas Carol plays as a simple but safe morality tale. Bob Cratchit’s poverty is hyperbolic and stylised (he carves a single pea to eat). Scrooge’s meanness and lack of empathy is a caricature, rather than an accurate case study. And so the darker elements of Dickens’ story are neutered due to the “Disneyfication” effect but does it mitigate the power of the story and its essential message? Not really, because the audience has elected to watch a Disney product, so they know in advance that they are not going to get a historically accurate depiction of 19th century deprivation. There is a minor concession to drama at the end, as Scrooge encounters his own hellbound grave which is tonally a little jarring. However, a more practical flaw in the film is making Scrooge essentially comic himself.
By Ebenezer Scrooge being played by Scrooge McDuck, an inherently witty and droll character, the viewer never really disapproves of him or finds him repellent. Hence his redemption at the story’s climax lacks any real impact. Compared to The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992) where Scrooge is played straight, with a cold and smouldering performance by Michael Caine, the comedy occurs around him highlighting his own emotional void. This different approach gives greater weight to the ending in the Muppet version. But I suppose it is critically redundant to apply such analysis to a short animated film that was never intended to be anything more than the sum of its parts. Mickey’s Christmas Carol is an entertaining half hour of family viewing, especially for those with young children still within Disney’s key age demographic. It provides the essential beats of Dickens’ tale along with all the key tropes of the studio that created it.
